This is going to be a two-parter. The first part focuses on ObamaCare and some
generalized discussion on the differences between the US…shall we say…“Commercial”,
privately-funded healthcare model and the socialized or single payer
(government) model. Part Two will
discuss my own personal interaction with both systems earlier this year.
Part One
Any day now the US Supreme Court is going to
rule on the constitutionality of the so-called “ObamaCare Law”, officially
known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. It was signed into law
in March of 2010 after a divisive battle featuring some unseemly political
bargaining like the “Louisiana Purchase” and “Cornhusker Kickback”, both the
blatant purchasing of votes. Of course,
that was just the beginning of the political maneuvering to get the bill passed
and of the granting of exemptions to the provisions of the bill to supportive
politicians. If it’s so great, why do
you need an exemption?
26 states joined together in challenging the
constitutionality of ObamaCare, which is essentially a federal takeover of the
healthcare system and a giant step toward the “single payer” system currently
used by the UK and Canada among others.
It had been a liberal/progressive dream for years and with a left wing
Democrat in the White House and liberals in control of both the House and
Senate, the perfect opportunity to cram it down the throats of a reluctant
nation. One of the more onerous
provisions of this 2700-page monster was the forcing of every citizen to
purchase health insurance from the Federal Government. That provision
represents one of the principal sources of funding for the program and one of the
pieces most likely to annoy the Justices.
The other major source of financing the
program is the looting of Medicare, an already bankrupt program. One half of the costs are provided by these
cuts mostly from chopping $204 billion in funding to the Medicare Advantage
Program, a highly popular and effective program enjoyed by some 12 million
seniors. Have not heard about this? The Obama Administration and their allies in
the media know that seniors vote in high numbers and when they figure out that
they are the ones getting shafted by Obama, they could cost Obama his
re-election.
To help mitigate the bad karma, Obama spent
millions of dollars in taxpayer bucks to run TV ads featuring Andy Griffith
touting how great ObamaCare would be. Obama’s soldiers also came up with an
$8.5 billion “demonstration project” sponsored by the Dept. of Health and Human
Services designed to postpone the cuts until after the election. The Government Accountability Office called
this project a “scam” and said HHS should cancel the program. In other words, the Administration is
spending $8.5 billion of taxpayer money to help insure Obama’s re-election
chances. Gee, does this sound like it might be a tad illegal?
Anyway, we’ll know soon when the Supremes
weigh in. As a side bar, Obama insulted the Supreme Court yet again when the
issue of ObamaCare came before them as he did once before in his State of the
Union address. I dunno, but I have never
considered it wise to piss off people in a position to decide your future.
I have never been able to understand the
liberal/ progressive obsession with government run healthcare. It does not work very well, certainly not as
well as the US system. Statistics prove
it. For example:
Breast
Cancer: US % fatal= 25% UK % Fatal= 46%
Prostate
Cancer: US Fatal= 19% UK % Fatal=57%
Heart
Death UK 19.5% higher than US
Canada has 1/3 fewer doctors than the OECD
average. You must wait an average of
17.3 weeks in Canada before you can see a specialist. 9.7 weeks for an MRI and 36.7 weeks (9 months)
to visit an orthopedic surgeon. Often
Canadians will journey south of the border and pay cash rather than wait for
their “free” homegrown healthcare.
And it’s really not free. There are fees and, of course, taxes are
high. British Columbia spends 40% of its
budget on health care demonstrating once again that the economic laws cannot be
contested, this one being: “When
something is free, there is never enough of it.” Financial pressure on the system in Canada
has brought on cuts in housekeeping staff and increase nursing workload. That and aging infrastructure has resulted in
an increasing number of hospital-acquired infections (MRSA, VRE and C.
difficile) killing hundreds.
Then too, there’s always the question of how
the money is being spent. Anything run
by the government tends to get bureaucratic and top heavy with
administrators. The UK public health
system, for example, has more bureaucrats than doctors.
Canadian hospitals spend a much larger
percentage of their budgets on administrators than do their American
counterparts. ObamaCare has mandated
whole new bureaucracies by the hundreds.
The flaws in the US healthcare system can
easily be improved and corrected by some simple changes. I have written about these in detail in the
past. That seems a much preferable
solution than tossing out the entire system in favor of the single payer model
with its demonstrable failures.
But, the political left instinctively favors
the government solution and they refuse to learn from experience or accept
facts that conflict with their group dogma.
They believe that once adopted that “free healthcare” will become
another “third rail” of untouchable government largess and help keep the most
generous party (them) in power. How’s
that generosity working out for European socialist economies right now?
No comments:
Post a Comment